Miltary News

• The littoral combat ship USS Freedom (LCS 1) departs Naval Station Mayport for its first operational deployment. Freedom will conduct counter-illicit trafficking operations and theater security cooperation in the U.S. 4th Fleet area of responsibility. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Lily Daniels/Released .

• At the airport in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti, sailors from USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) and soldiers from the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division prepare for transit of relief supplies on Jan. 17, 2010. The U.S. military moved quickly to conduct humanitarian and disaster relief operations as part of Operation Unified Response after a 7.0 magnitude earthquake caused severe damage in Haiti Jan. 12, 2010. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Candice Villarreal

As the price of oil skyrocketed in 2008, some in Congress argued that it was pointless to keep building oil-powered warships. Surely the future lay with a return to the vision of the 1960s, when it seemed that nuclear power would soon dominate. A congressionally mandated study by the Congressional Research Service concluded that once oil was $70 per barrel, “the total life-cycle costs of a nuclear-powered medium-size surface combatant would equal that of a conventionally powered medium-size surface combatant.” It seems likely that the future cruiser, (CG[X]), at one time seen as a variant of the Zumwalt-class destroyer, will be nuclear powered. Therefore it appears to be a good time to take stock of the current nuclear program, to ask what has changed since the rush toward nuclear power stopped in the 1970s, and also to look at foreign nuclear-powered surface warships.

In the late 1950s, it was assumed by some observers that at some point the U.S. Navy would build only nuclear warships. About 1955, the Bureau of Ships (the ancestor of the current Naval Sea Systems Command [NAVSEA]) produced a booklet of futuristic surface combatants, down to the level of frigates (then called destroyer escorts), all of them nuclear. The nuclear power organization within the bureau developed a range of reactor designs, including ones suitable for a cruiser (Long Beach) and, what was considered remarkable at the time, a large destroyer (Bainbridge), as well as for the carrier Enterprise. Excluding carriers, the U.S. Navy commissioned nine nuclear surface ships between 1961 and 1980. Long Beach (CGN 9), Bainbridge (CGN 25), and Truxtun (CGN 35) were each unique, the only ships of their class. These were followed by the two cruisers of the California class – California (CGN 36) and South Carolina (CGN 37) – and the four cruisers of the Virginia class – Virginia (CGN 38), Texas (CGN 39), Mississippi (CGN 40), and Arkansas (CGN 41). All of these ships were attractive because they could operate at maximum speed on a sustained basis. They were no faster than conventionally powered ships, but a ship using oil fuel cannot maintain high speed for very long. Particularly before the Soviets had nuclear submarines, speed itself offered considerable immunity to submarine attack. Even after the Soviets had submarines as fast as U.S. aircraft carriers, they could not hope to intercept such fast ships unless they were already trailing them, or they were cued by the Soviets’ complex ocean surveillance system. The latter was graphically demonstrated in 1968 when a Soviet November-class submarine intercepted USS Enterprise en route to Vietnam.

Current naval views of nuclear propulsion are inevitably colored by the way in which Adm. Hyman G. Rickover, for decades the chief of the program, handled it – and, more importantly, nuclear personnel. Rickover had a keen sense of the tactical and strategic potential of nuclear power. In effect he created a separate nuclear machinery organization outside the Bureau of Ships and its successor. His experience with conventional machinery convinced him that the nuclear innovation would succeed only if nuclear power was perceived as absolutely reliable. To that end, he insisted on intense training for all reactor operators (and all officers of nuclear ships had to be qualified operators). He rejected automation, the result being that nuclear engine rooms needed unusually large numbers of personnel who also were much more expensive than the average. Personnel made nuclear ships more expensive than might have been imagined. So did extremely strict standards for construction – which Rickover pointed out were the inevitable cost of the attractive new technology…

Unmanned and Under Way: Progress in Unmanned Maritime Systems

By J.R. Wilson in Naval under Print Edition with no comments

Navy Seeks to Eliminate Sexual Assault in its Ranks

From Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- The Navy released its first quarterly Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) program update, NAVADMIN 096/10, to update Sailors with the information necessary to positively impact their environment and lead the Navy toward its goal of eliminating sexual assault from its ranks. "Sexual assault is an assault against unit cohesion, readiness and Navy's core values," said Rear Adm. Dan Holloway, director of personnel, plans and policy. "It is a Department of the Navy (DoN) goal to eliminate sexual assault incidents that impact DoN personnel and their family members." In 2009, the Navy renamed the Sexual Assault Victim Intervention program to SAPR to align with the mission of the program, highlighting the importance of both prevention and response. Since then, Navy SAPR coordinators have focused on the development and implementation of a comprehensive and effective prevention and response strategy. Navy leaders are making sexual assault prevention a top priority. Prevention efforts are focused on non-stranger and alcohol-facilitated sexual assaults. In the Navy's 2009 Annual Report of Sexual Assaults in the Military, more than half of the reports involved military subjects committing offenses against military victims. Fleet organizers held the first waterfront SAPR workshop in February at Naval Station Norfolk. It was attended by more than 170 command leaders and 150 first responders. Future workshops in other fleet concentration areas are planned. The training focuses on increasing awareness, defining expectations and identifying resources available to commands. In March, the fleet also began a peer-to-peer prevention training pilot program aimed at developing effective bystander intervention skills. "This pilot training, tailored to Sailors and deckplate leaders who are critical to the success of sexual assault prevention, is designed to discover the best way to implement and sustain cultural change in our Navy," said Paul Finch, Commander, Navy Installations Command SAPR program manager. "The overall goal is to create a culture of respect that requires that we all see ourselves as part of the solution, and to intervene to prevent sexual assault within our Navy environment." The bystander intervention program teaches Sailors how to intervene in cases of sexual violence before, during and after incidents occur. This peer-to-peer program, using the Mentors in Violence Prevention model, will be tested within different training environments in Norfolk, Hawaii, Pensacola and Bahrain. "After the project is complete," according to Finch, "we will know what works best for Sailors so we can implement effective bystander training Navywide." This year, the Navy again included SAPR training in annual general military training requirements for all Sailors and will add sexual assault awareness questions to Navywide advancement exams in 2011. Navy Criminal Investigative Service, Bureau of Medicine, Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps and other key stakeholders have also focused on improving their response to sexual assault. "We have the obligation and power to intervene and prevent sexual assault. We must continue our efforts to eliminate this crime from our ranks," said Holloway. For more information on the Navy's SAPR program, read NAVADMIN 096/10 and visit http://www.sapr.mil/. For more news from Navy Personnel Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/npc/.

Navy Cyber Forces, Naval Network Warfare Command Names 2010 Sailors of the Year

By Chief Mass Comunication Specialist (SW/AW) Aaron Strickland, Naval Network Warfare Command/Navy Cyber Forces Public Affairs VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (NNS) -- Navy Cyber Forces (NCF) and Naval Network Warfare Command (NNWC) named its 2010 Sailors of the Year in a ceremony on Joint Expeditionary Command Little Creek-Fort Story March 18. Cryptologic Technician (Interpretive) 1st Class (NAC/AW) Nolan D. Workman, an EP-3 special operator instructor based at Navy Information Operations Command Misawa, Japan, is the NNWC Sea Sailor of the Year. Construction Electrician 1st Class (SCW) Gerald M. Mabrito, N6 Maintenance Department leading petty officer at Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station Detachment Naples, is the NNWC Shore Sailor of the Year. Cryptologic Technician (Collection) 1st Class (FMF) Bradley J. Calendar, network nodal analysis for Navy Net-centric Warfare Group, is the NNWC Reservist of the Year. NCF and NNWC interim Force Master Chief (AW) Gordon Brightbill, said that the competition was tough. For three days, 10 candidates from NNWC's worldwide commands worked out and performed team-building tests, culminating with individual oral boards. The winners were announced at a breakfast on the fourth day. "The selections get harder and harder every year," Brightbill said. "Any of these Sailors would have represented the command well. We can only select three though they all are deserving." Workman said his selection was all about his Sailors, not about himself. "My being here is a testament to the teamwork at (NIOC) Misawa and it speaks for all the support I get from the chiefs there," he said. Mabrito was the most surprised in the group, at first insisting that they must have called the wrong name. "I just go to work and do my job," he said. "I wasn't looking for all this attention, but I'm impressed with how much the Navy has done to support us." Calendar, whose civilian occupation is a policeman in the Phoenix area, said he had a great time during the week, which gave him a break from his one-year recall to active duty in Iraq. "I had just an amazing time this week," he said. "I met so many great folks and made some friends this week, too." Calendar spent eight years on active duty before joining the Reserves four years ago. NCF/NNWC Senior Enlisted Advisor, Master Chief Information Systems Technician (SW) Gary Myers, said he was impressed with each Sailor. "Every nominee was a winner," Myers said. "All of our winners will represent us well at the next level." All three Sailors will now compete for Fleet Forces Command Sailor of the Year. The three winners of that competition are recognized by Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Gary Roughead, in Washington and are meritoriously promoted to chief petty officer. For more news from Naval Network Warfare Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/nnwc/.

Since the first ship put to sea thousands of years ago, sealift has been the primary method used to move large amounts of materiel and large numbers of warfighters into a combat theater. Only in the last few decades has airlift become the principal mode of transport for troops, as well as the supplies required for initial insertion.

But sealift remains the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)’s main method of moving the bulk of supplies and equipment required for military operations, both combat and humanitarian/disaster relief. The overall coordination of military transport assets for all services is handled by the joint U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM), while sealift is a shared responsibility of the Navy’s Military Sealift Command (MSC) and the Army’s Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC).

Headquartered at the Washington Navy Yard, in Washington, D.C., MSC is tasked with supporting the nation by delivering supplies and conducting specialized missions across the world’s oceans. To conduct its primary operations, the Command is organized around four mission areas; the Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force, Special Mission, Prepositioning, and Sealift. It also has five Sealift Logistics Commands operating in the Atlantic, Pacific, Europe, Central, and Far East areas, each serving as primary point of contact for MSC customers and numbered fleet commanders in that area. They also provide direct links from the MSC commander to MSC ships for maintenance oversight, logistics coordination, and other services.

Most Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force (NFAF) ships replenish the Navy fleet at sea with food, fuel, spare parts, and ammunition. However, the NFAF also includes MSC’s two hospital ships, each with 12 operating rooms and 1,000 beds, which are maintained at a readiness state enabling them to deploy within five days of receiving orders.

Special Mission ships cover a wide range of operations, including oceanographic and coastal surveys, ocean surveillance, missile tracking, cable laying and repair, and deep submergence recovery. Their crews typically include military and civilian scientists and technicians, alongside MSC employees and contract mariners.

The Afloat Prepositioning Force comprises ships strategically positioned around the world to provide rapid support to the Navy, Marine Corps, Army, Air Force, and the Defense Logistics Agency to meet fast-breaking requirements.

Sealift ships include both government-owned and short- and long-term charter tankers and dry cargo vessels to move DoD materiel in both combat and peacetime operations. They are the heart of MSC’s surge sealift capability to rapidly load and deliver equipment and supplies wherever needed.

The Ready Reserve Force consists of ships owned and maintained in a reduced operating status by the U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD) until called into action and transferred to MSC control for deployment.

SDDC’s sealift role involves contracting for commercial liner services – civilian ships paid to carry military cargo alongside commercial already going to ports from which the DoD assets can be moved into theater by air or convoy. Presently, liner services are handling virtually all sea traffic into and out of theaters of operation in Southwest Asia.

In a new operation, however, MSC is brought into play to meet the first response transport requirements, employing its own fleet of some 110 noncombatant, civilian-crewed ships and MARAD’s 49 government-owned, formerly commercial, Ready Reserve Force vessels. The MSC inventory includes 31 prepositioning ships around the world, carrying military supplies typically needed first and fast in any new operation; 41 Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force vessels; 19 roll-on/roll-off (RORO) ships; and 27 Special Mission ships.

While more than 90 percent of U.S. combat equipment and supplies travel by sea, government policy requires MSC to look first to the U.S.-flagged liner fleet to meet long-term requirements, turning to its own government-owned ships only when suitable commercial vessels are unavailable. The goal of that policy is to help support and maintain a robust U.S. commercial fleet – some 95 percent of all commercial cargo travels by sea – as well as expand DoD’s sealift capability without the expense of maintaining a significantly larger MSC fleet.

“We rely on ships from the global marketplace, but always provide a preference to U.S.-flagged vessels,” noted Chris Thayer, senior executive and director of strategic sealift and prepositioning for MSC. “So if a U.S.-flagged vessel is available and responds to the RFP [request for proposal], we will charter those first. If there are none available in the time or location, then we go to the rest of the global marketplace.

“The preponderance of U.S.-flagged ships operate in commercial charter, so when we are seeking an expansion of capability in regions that do not have scheduled commercial liner service with vessels with military RORO capability, we often rely on the global market because there are not a lot of U.S.-flagged ships in those trades.”

Rear Adm. Mark H. Buzby, who took command of MSC in October 2009, said he is satisfied with the current MSC fleet’s ability to meet DoD sealift requirements, especially the large, medium-speed, RORO (LMSR) ships added to MSC’s fleet since the first Gulf War in 1991.

“I think we have the right mix of ships between MSC and the Maritime Ready Reserve Force. That is a wide variety of ship types, with great utility and very few single-mission vessels, which gives us a wide flexibility to tailor a response from humanitarian and disaster relief all the way up to deployment in support of a war, carrying strictly heavy fighting equipment,” he said.

“The investments we made in our LMSR [ships] paid big dividends, as did the investments in our maritime prepositioning ships. Having ships purpose-built to move large military cargo rapidly, onload/offload easily, with large capacity inside to move equipment around has enabled us to streamline and shorten the time lines of sealift. These are newer ships, so the reliability is very high. And they can repeat that process time and time again.”

MSC’s transport capabilities are growing significantly in 2010, with delivery of the ninth of the Navy’s newest class of logistics vessels, the Lewis and Clark-class dry cargo/ammunition (T-AKE) ships, and launch of the 10th.

MSC took delivery of the USNS Matthew Perry on Feb. 24, following six months of tests and sea trials. Three days later, the USNS Charles Drew was christened and launched at the General Dynamics NASSCO shipyard in San Diego, Calif. The Perry is scheduled to begin MSC missions this fall in the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean, with the Drew being delivered to the fleet about the same time.

“The T-AKEs are an incredibly important asset to the Navy and we are proud to see the class continue to grow,” said Capt. Jerome Hamel, commander of Sealift Logistics Command-Pacific. “Not only do the T-AKEs support Navy warfighters by delivering stores, ammunition, fuel, and spare parts, but the ships are also capable of fulfilling non-traditional missions, such as the 2009 Pacific Partnership humanitarian assistance mission of USNS Richard E. Byrd.”

Manned by 124 civil service mariners and 11 Navy sailors, who provide supply coordination, the T-AKEs allow Navy ships to remain at sea, on station, and combat ready for extended periods of time.

Buzby also is looking forward to the addition of two new ship types to the fleet – the Navy/Army Joint High Speed Vessel (JHSV), a shallow-draft (less than 15 feet) ship intended for rapid intra-theater transport of medium-sized cargo payloads. With speeds up to 45 knots, it will be able to move personnel, equipment, and supplies rapidly over operational distances to support conventional and special forces maneuver and sustainment operations. The JHSV also will have a flight deck for helicopter operations and an off-load ramp enabling vehicles to quickly drive off the ship.

“We saw a glimpse of its capabilities in the use of the Hawaiian superferry [in Haiti], which gave us a chance to see what running a high-speed vessel is like. We plan to build at least five of those for the Navy and five for the Army in the current plan,” he said. “That will be a great new flexible capability we will have before long.”

The second new vessel is the Mobile Landing Platform, (MLP) a heavy-lift ship also known as a float-on/float-off (FLO/FLO) design to transport causeway sections, berthing barges, containers, and landing craft, air cushioned (LCAC).

“[The MLP is] a new type of ship that will enable us to do faster in-stream offloads where required. It also will provide an interface with others going ashore, such as Navy LCUs [Landing Craft, Utility] or Army LSVs [Logistics Support Vessels],” Buzby said. “Those also are coming soon to give us more flexibility and capability to move product ashore, especially when making a beach assault or going into a port, such as Haiti, where the infrastructure has been destroyed.”

MSC’s existing fleet amply demonstrated its capabilities at the beginning of 2010, utilizing nearly every aspect of its organization to rapidly respond to the Haitian earthquake relief effort. Because the earthquake devastated both the airport and port at Port-au-Prince, Haiti’s capital and transport center, the MSC ships provided vital immediate support.

“When the full scope of the disaster became understood, the MSC response was swift. MSC hospital ship USNS Comfort was ready to sail in just three days. Normally the activation process takes five, but Comfort got under way just 76.5 hours after notification with a crew of 67 civil service mariners, 560 medical personnel, and an approximately 110-person contingent of support personnel,” Buzby said.

During its seven weeks in Haiti, Comfort’s military and civilian medical staff treated 871 patients – 540 of those in the first 10 days, with one new patient arriving every 6 to 9 minutes at the height of the recovery effort – and performed 843 surgeries aboard ship. Ten operating rooms were run at full capacity to provide surgical care for earthquake victims in the first full operational-capacity employment of the hospital ship since it was delivered to the Navy in 1987.

“Overall, we put 21 ships into motion as part of the response effort,” Buzby said. “Of MSC’s total force of more than 8,900 people, more than 2,600 mariners, sailors, control element personnel, and other support people – 29 percent of our total personnel – have been directly involved in Operation Unified Response.”

The first MSC ships set sail for Haiti within 24 hours of the earthquake – even before official orders came down the chain of command, following a “lean forward” procedure put in place two years ago by TRANSCOM for each of its service components to respond accordingly and immediately to any emergency requirement.

Drawing from each of its mission units, MSC worked to open the port; provide fuel and other supplies to forces arriving at the island; survey and clear the harbor; evaluate damage to the piers and docks; deliver the first major heavy equipment and over-the-beach delivery capability; assist in the offloading of ships unable to use the devastated port; move hundreds of military personnel to the island; evacuate American citizens, refugees, and children; provide hospital ship care in place of destroyed island hospitals; and provide extensive assistance to ships of all nations moving in and out of the disaster area.

“In the initial entry phase, if you look at Haiti or any scenario where one airfield can quickly become overwhelmed, along with devastation in the port area, the ability to bring in ships that can offload off-port shows the unique capability sealift can bring to bear, not only in delivering goods but also opening up a port,” Thayer said, noting both Haiti and the war in Southwest Asia also have demonstrated the value of military-civilian cooperation at sea.

“In the past decade, the value of the maritime security program in assuring we have a reasonably robust U.S.-flagged fleet of ships to support military requirements has proven its value as a complement to the ships the Navy and the Maritime Administration maintain in reduced operating status to support military requirements. That program is good for commerce and the military and supports a base of U.S. mariners we need to crew those ships we activate from reduced operating status.”

Thayer estimates the ratio of mariners to seagoing jobs in the private sector is roughly 2-to-2.5 to 1, an overage needed to meet labor agreements saying mariners will work for three or four months at sea, followed by three or four months off.

“For every billet on the ship, there are two or three ashore available to augment any contingency requirements,” he said. “So it is a strong base, not only for ocean-going ships, but also inland waterways.”

MSC’s prepositioning ships also have added significantly to the U.S. military’s ability to respond quickly to almost any point on the globe, providing supplies needed by all the services only a few days’ sail away rather than far longer times it might take supplies to reach theater from the United States.

“From the first Gulf war through today, we have had large quantities afloat on ships prepositioned in key spots around the world to respond rapidly with the right mix of heavy combat forces or civil assistance,” Thayer said. “That has become a hallmark of the triad of strategic sealift, along with surged sealift from reduced operating status and sustainment from the ocean transportation providers.”

The ships used to reach a combat theater or relief site where standard port facilities are not available are not MSC’s only concern for future capabilities, however. Being able to safely transfer cargo from large transports to smaller vessels capable of moving them to shore also is being addressed under a new program to develop synchronized cranes.

“[Those will] synchronize with both the vessels being offloaded and loaded, to work in higher in-stream seastates. If you are swinging a heavy load on a crane where vessels are bouncing around, there is a high chance of damaging the cargo or the ships,” Buzby said. “This new technology can synchronize all that so you can soft land the cargo. We’re testing that right now and the reports I’ve gotten so far are very promising, so I can see that fielded in the next couple of years.”

On any given day, MSC estimates it has about 110 ships in operation around the globe and offers overall contingency support for 15.4 billion gallons of fuel and 109.4 million square feet of dry cargo.

With the coming new additions to the fleet, adding to capability already in place, Buzby believes the United States stands alone in the ability to deliver both military cargo and humanitarian relief quickly and efficiently by sea to any coastal point on Earth. Given seas and oceans cover some 65 percent of the planet and the vast majority of the population lives within 100 miles of a coast, that is a significant advantage.

“There is no other nation with the logistics capabilities we have to mount an initial response and sustain that response any faster or with the depth and range of response we made in Haiti,” he said. “Who else can move a city hospital 3,000 miles in three days and have it operating on arrival? Only the Comfort and Mercy offer that capability.”